Good morning. Futures are moderately higher, sp +6pts, we're set to open around 1864 - a mere 19pts (1.1%) shy of a new high. Precious metals are lower, Gold -$7, Silver -1.1%. Equity bulls look set to remain in control until at least the FOMC of Wednesday afternoon.
sp'60min
Summary
*awaiting econ-data: CPI, housing
--
So...we're set to open higher in the mid 1860s, and it remains disturbing that we'll be barely 1% from breaking a new high.
What have all the doomers who were touting 'big gap down on Monday' to say about that?
--
Video update from Oscar
As for Oscar's 2014 projection (see video, I ain't spoiling it!), I could agree with it, but if we see a multi-month roll over this spring/summer, it'll be tough to hit Oscar's target before end year. Of course, if Yellen goes nuclear with QE (>$100bn a month), then the sky is the limit.
re: Oscar's target
sp'monthly5
Kinda interesting that a natural Fib' extrap... gives that zone, although I was thinking it would be far more likely in late 2015, than this year.
--
As ever..updates across the day.
8.32am CPI +0.1%..although of course, some will dismiss such Govt data.
Metals are sliding, Gold -$13, sp' holding gains +6pts @ 1864.
-
Tuesday, 18 March 2014
Not much longer to wait
US equities started the week on a positive note, but last week saw some notable damage to the multi-week up wave from sp'1737. Equity bears just need to hold the market from breaking new highs (>1883), and break under the recent low of 1834, then the fun can begin.
sp'weekly7b
Summary
The above scenario remains a particularly attractive one, but it is just one of a number of outlooks I am keeping in mind.
I'm seeking not just a multi-week cycle peak..but a multi-month peak - stretching back all the way back to Oct'2011. Even if sp'1883 was a key high, we won't likely know for at least 6-8 weeks, and that would require both a break <1737, along with a subsequent lower high <1883.
In theory we could be in the 1600s, and still not really have any justification to call a top via standard chart theory. That is of course the problem with much of this chart stuff, if waiting for a clear break, by the time there is a clear move...half of the drop (or rally) will probably have already occurred!
Needing a monthly close <10 MA
The following is a simple chart, but I think it does highlight how the 10MA sure is an important MA of support/resistance.
sp'monthly'3, rainbow
Equity bears need a March close under the 10MA - currently 1751, to break the grand up wave from Oct'2011. With 10 trading days left of the month, I find it difficult to believe we'll drop 107pts, although that is only 5.7% lower.
Looking ahead
We have CPI and housing starts, and if those come in 'reasonable'..market should be able to break into the 1860s..if not also a brief break into the 1870s.
*next sig' QE-pomo is not until Thursday
--
Just a few more days to wait.
Having decided to throw in the towel, wave the white flag - or whatever you want to call it, last summer, I'm finally now open to shorting the market, once the next FOMC announcement is out of the way.
If we have a simple H/S (see hourly index cycle), then we shouldn't break into the 1880s again. For those who do decide to short any FOMC bounce/spike, trading short-stops are pretty clear - in the 1875/85 zone.
If we see the 1890s..then clearly the 1900s are coming, and equity bears would again have to bail and reassess.
At T-2 days..and counting...this is your resident permabear...
Goodnight from London
sp'weekly7b
Summary
The above scenario remains a particularly attractive one, but it is just one of a number of outlooks I am keeping in mind.
I'm seeking not just a multi-week cycle peak..but a multi-month peak - stretching back all the way back to Oct'2011. Even if sp'1883 was a key high, we won't likely know for at least 6-8 weeks, and that would require both a break <1737, along with a subsequent lower high <1883.
In theory we could be in the 1600s, and still not really have any justification to call a top via standard chart theory. That is of course the problem with much of this chart stuff, if waiting for a clear break, by the time there is a clear move...half of the drop (or rally) will probably have already occurred!
Needing a monthly close <10 MA
The following is a simple chart, but I think it does highlight how the 10MA sure is an important MA of support/resistance.
sp'monthly'3, rainbow
Equity bears need a March close under the 10MA - currently 1751, to break the grand up wave from Oct'2011. With 10 trading days left of the month, I find it difficult to believe we'll drop 107pts, although that is only 5.7% lower.
Looking ahead
We have CPI and housing starts, and if those come in 'reasonable'..market should be able to break into the 1860s..if not also a brief break into the 1870s.
*next sig' QE-pomo is not until Thursday
--
Just a few more days to wait.
Having decided to throw in the towel, wave the white flag - or whatever you want to call it, last summer, I'm finally now open to shorting the market, once the next FOMC announcement is out of the way.
If we have a simple H/S (see hourly index cycle), then we shouldn't break into the 1880s again. For those who do decide to short any FOMC bounce/spike, trading short-stops are pretty clear - in the 1875/85 zone.
If we see the 1890s..then clearly the 1900s are coming, and equity bears would again have to bail and reassess.
At T-2 days..and counting...this is your resident permabear...
Goodnight from London
Daily Index Cycle update
US equities started the week on a positive note, sp +17pts @ 1858. The two leaders - Trans/R2K, settled with gains of 0.9% and 0.6% respectively. Near term outlook is for further gains into the 1870s, before a sharp wave lower after the next FOMC is out of the way.
sp'daily5
R2K
Trans
Summary
The two leaders do look especially tired, despite today's gains.
New highs... >1883, look pretty unlikely, as supported by the weakening weekly index cycles.
--
Closing update from Mr Riley
--
a little more later...
sp'daily5
R2K
Trans
Summary
The two leaders do look especially tired, despite today's gains.
New highs... >1883, look pretty unlikely, as supported by the weakening weekly index cycles.
--
Closing update from Mr Riley
--
a little more later...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






